U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Jamie Finley

United States v. Jamie Finley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 18, 2013

United States v. Jamie Finley

Opinion

Case: 12-20493 Document: 00512277402 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-20493 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMIE LYNN FINLEY, also known as Jamie Lynn Finley-Black, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-609-2

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jamie Lynn Finley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Finley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-20493 Document: 00512277402 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 No. 12-20493 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.