Victor Mendoza v. United States
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint and for the additional reason that the Complaint is a collateral attack of Plaintiffs judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846 and is barred by Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1127-29 (5th Cir. 1987); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26 (5th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Victor Manuel MENDOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished