The attorney appointed to represent Cristobal Meza, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meza has filed a response with an incorporated motion to dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Meza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Additionally, Meza’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot.