Duang Xiu Lin (Lin), a native and citizen of China, has petitioned for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her third motion to reopen. Because the BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision without opinion, the IJ’s decision is the final agency determination for purposes of judicial review. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 831-32 (5th Cir. 2003). Lin asserts that the time limits applicable to motions to reopen are not applicable because repression of Falun Gong, which she began practicing in 2008, has worsened in China since her original immigration proceedings in 1999.

Lin’s self-induced changed personal circumstances do not constitute changed country conditions. See Yang Xin Chun v. Holder, 335 Fed.Appx. 454, 455 (5th Cir. 2009). Teng Fei Liu v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 359 Fed.Appx. 993, 995 (11th Cir. 2010), cited by Lin, is inapposite because the IJ did consider Lin’s evidence in determining that the evidence did not show changed country conditions. Because the IJ’s finding that the Chinese government’s suppression of Falun Gong has been continuing and ongoing since 1999 is supported by substantial evidence, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in refusing to reopen the immigration proceedings. The petition is DENIED.