Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Saul Solis-Arroyo raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir. 2008), which rejected the argument that fast track programs create unwarranted disparities between defendants in districts that have the programs and defendants in districts that do not have such programs. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affir-mance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.