United States v. Pedro Estrada-Rodriguez
Opinion
Case: 13-40975 Document: 00512598111 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-40975 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 16, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13-CR-328-1
Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Estrada-Rodriguez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales- Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2374 (2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin, 487 F. App’x 139, 141-43 (5th Cir. 2012) (unpublished), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 1847 (2013), rejected the argument that the Texas offense of Case: 13-40975 Document: 00512598111 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40975 “burglary of a habitation” is outside the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession.”
Accordingly, Estrada-Rodriguez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.