United States v. Paul Martinez
United States v. Paul Martinez
Opinion
Case: 13-10299 Document: 00512605150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/23/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-10299 April 23, 2014 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PAUL ANTHONY MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-103-3
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Paul Anthony Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-10299 Document: 00512605150 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/23/2014
No. 13-10299 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.