Hector Rafael Deleon-Ajiataz pleaded guilty to being found knowingly and unlawfully present in the United States following deportation and received a below-guidelines prison sentence of 86 months. Deleon-Ajiataz argues on appeal that he was improperly convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)’s enhanced statutory maximum sentence, asserting that he does not have a prior conviction for an aggravated felony as the statute requires. Our review is for plain error. United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2009).

The statutes of conviction and adjudicative records that we may consider, see Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 17-26, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005); Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), do not support a determination that Deleon-Ajiataz had a prior aggravated felony conviction as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Regardless of any plain error, however, Deleon-Ajiataz is not entitled to remand for resentencing because, as he concedes, he cannot show that any error affected his sentence. See Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 369. Nonetheless, because Deleon-Ajiataz’s illegal reentry offense was a § 1326(b)(1) violation rather than a § 1326(b)(2) violation, we REMAND for the sole purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect the proper *375 statute of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. In all other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED.