Defendant-Appellant Raul Sanehez-Per-ez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court sentenced Sanchez-Perez within the guidelines range to 50 months of imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Sanchez-Perez argues that the district court erred in imposing a term of supervised release in a case involving a deportable alien without providing fact-specific reasons for its decision to deviate from U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c)’s recommendation that supervised release not be imposed in such circumstances. We review this argument for plain error. See United States v. Dominguez-Alvarado, 695 F.3d 324, 327-28 (5th Cir. 2012).

The district court retains the discretion to impose supervised release ip “uncommon cases [involving a deportable alien] where added deterrence and protection are needed.” Id. at 329. In sentencing Sanchez-Perez, the district court specifically stated that supervised release was imposed as an additional potential sanction should Sanchez-Perez attempt to return illegally. Consequently, Sanchez-Perez has shown no plain error on the part of the district court in imposing a term of supervised release. See id. at 329-30; see also United States v. Becerril-Pena, 714 F.3d 347, 349-51 (5th Cir. 2013).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.