U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Fernando Mora-Robledo

United States v. Fernando Mora-Robledo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2014

United States v. Fernando Mora-Robledo

Opinion

Case: 13-40707 Document: 00512666040 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40707 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. FERNANDO ALFREDO MORA-ROBLEDO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-1743-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Alfredo Mora-Robledo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mora-Robledo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Mora-Robledo’s response. We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-40707 Document: 00512666040 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014

No. 13-40707 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Mora-Robledo’s arguments about the appeal from his new illegal-reentry conviction are not before us here as they are pending under case No. 13-40705.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Mora-Robledo’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.