U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. David Dominguez

United States v. David Dominguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2014

United States v. David Dominguez

Opinion

Case: 13-40753 Document: 00512666582 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40753 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAVID PETE DOMINGUEZ, also known as Buda, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-1002-6

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent David Pete Dominguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dominguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-40753 Document: 00512666582 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014

No. 13-40753 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.