U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Miguel Quintero

United States v. Miguel Quintero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 6, 2014

United States v. Miguel Quintero

Opinion

Case: 13-10937 Document: 00512724159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 13-10937 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar August 6, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-392-4

Before SMITH, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Quintero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Quintero has filed a response. His motion for an order directing counsel to supply the record is DENIED. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Quintero’s response.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-10937 Document: 00512724159 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2014

No. 13-10937 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.