Anthony Lawrence v. Marlin Gusman
Anthony Lawrence v. Marlin Gusman
582 F. App'x 539
Anthony Lawrence v. Marlin Gusman
Opinion
After studying the briefs and the record and hearing the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of Anthony Lawrence. Thus, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for entry of judgment in favor of Samuel Gore.
REVERSED, and REMANDED for entry of judgment dismissing the complaint.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.