After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support plaintiff Weems’s age-based discrimination claims. *372 Weems failed to point to sufficient evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the school district’s legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its hiring decisions were false and a pretext for age-based discrimination. Cf. Leal v. McHugh, 731 F.3d 405, 411 (5th Cir. 2013).

We AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment in the school district’s favor.

AFFIRMED.