United States v. Dustin Pulido
Opinion
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Dustin Pulido raises an argument *453 that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that a sentence within the statutory maximum that is based upon judge-found facts does not violate the Sixth Amendment. Accordingly, the unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *453 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dustin PULIDO, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished