U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Crystal Compton

United States v. Crystal Compton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 4, 2014

United States v. Crystal Compton

Opinion

Case: 13-11418 Document: 00512825651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-11418 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 4, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. CRYSTAL COMPTON, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-175-35

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Crystal Compton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Compton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-11418 Document: 00512825651 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014

No. 13-11418 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.