United States v. Steven Donoso

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Steven Donoso

Opinion

Case: 13-51181 Document: 00512828712 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 13-51181 Fifth Circuit

FILED Summary Calendar November 6, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEVEN DONOSO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-67-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Steven Donoso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967), and United States v. Flores,

632 F.3d 229

(5th Cir. 2011). Donoso has not filed a response. During the pendency of this appeal, Donoso completed the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-51181 Document: 00512828712 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2014

No. 13-51181

custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna,

523 U.S. 1, 7

(1998); United States v. Clark,

193 F.3d 845, 847-48

(5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished