Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), Antonio M. Lacy, Texas prisoner # 594575, appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit challenging the forfeiture of funds from his inmate trust account following his disciplinary conviction for trafficking and trading. Lacy is barred from proceeding IFP because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he has brought a civil action in a court of the United States that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See Lacy v. Velasquez, 54 Fed.Appx. 798 (5th Cir. 2002); Lacy v. Collins, 1995 WL 535114 (5th Cir. Aug. 8, 1995); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, nothing in the record reflects that Lacy is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g).

Accordingly, Lacy’s IFP status is decer-tified, and the appeal is dismissed. Lacy has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.