Issy Avila-Baule appeals her 36-month within-guidelines sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. She claims that the district court plainly erred in applying the eight-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) based on a finding that her Texas conviction of felony theft was an aggravated felony. She contends that Texas’s theft statute encompasses conduct broader than the generic, contemporary definition of theft because the Texas statute includes the appropriation of property when it is with consent that has been induced through deception or coercion. In United States v. Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d 437, 438 (5th Cir. 2014), we rejected that theory and held that the Texas theft statute, as set forth in Texas Penal Code § 31.03, “does not deviate from the generic crime of theft.”

AFFIRMED.