United States v. Miguel Valdez-Bautista

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Miguel Valdez-Bautista, 606 F. App'x 146 (5th Cir. 2014)
Dennis, King, Per Curiam, Southwick

United States v. Miguel Valdez-Bautista

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Valdez-Bautista has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valdez-Bautista has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel VALDEZ-BAUTISTA, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished