U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Sterling

United States v. Sterling
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2014 · Jones, Prado, Reavley
556 F. App'x 350

United States v. Sterling

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Joe Dell Sterling has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sterling has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with coun*351sel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.