U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Castillo

United States v. Castillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 10, 2014 · Clement, Jolly, Smith
562 F. App'x 218

United States v. Castillo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Suhaily Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Or. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.