The attorney appointed to represent Ismael Melgoza-Arredondo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Melgoza-Arre-dondo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Melgoza-Arredondo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that *353the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review because the defendant validly agreed to waive appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for- leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.