U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2014

Panetti v. Stephens

Panetti v. Stephens
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 3, 2014 · Higginbotham, Owen, Stewart
586 F. App'x 163

Counsel

Kathryn M. Kase, Esq., Texas Defender Service, Houston, TX, Gregory William Wiereioeh, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI, for Petitioner-Appellant., Ellen Stewartí-Klein, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Panetti v. Stephens

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

We STAY the execution pending further order of the court to allow us to fully consider the late arriving and complex legal questions at issue in this matter.1 An order setting a briefing schedule and oral argument will follow.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. ,

. See 28 U.S.C. § 2251(a)(3); McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 858, 114 S.Ct. 2568, 129 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.