The attorney appointed to represent Ra-cyna Antoinette Henry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Henry has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Henry’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-*843frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel- is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.