The attorney appointed to represent Soul Martines Crus has moved for leave to *257 withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martines Crus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to withdraw based on the closing of her law practice is DENIED as unnecessary.