It is undisputed that the written judgment convicting Ramon Vasquez-Diaz of illegal reentry of a deported alien incorrectly reflects that he was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). The parties disagree as to whether the proper remedy is remand for the district court to enter a modified judgment or for this court itself to modify and affirm the judgment. We choose the latter. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court but REFORM it to reflect conviction and sentencing under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santia go, 564 F.3d 357, 368-69 (5th Cir. 2009); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2106; United States v. Hermoso, 484 FedAppx. 970, 972-73 (5th Cir. 2012).