Xincheng An, a native and citizen of China, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings (he was ordered to be removed to China in 2011). He contends the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen as untimely because he *277 met the changed-eircumstances exception due to China’s enforcement of its population control policies. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii). Pursuant to our highly deferential review of the denial of a motion to reopen, Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 303 (5th Cir. 2005), An has not shown the • BIA abused its discretion in concluding the exception did not apply. E.g., Panjwani v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 626, 632-33 (5th Cir. 2005).

DENIED.