Hilario Torres-Hernandez appeals the 57-month within-guidelines sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He challenges the 16-level enhancement imposed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for having been deported after being convicted of a drug trafficking offense. Torres-Hernandez argues that his Texas conviction for possession with intent to deliver cocaine did not qualify as a drug trafficking offense because Texas’s definition of delivery is broader than the definition of a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. He asserts that the Texas offense of delivery may be committed by “administering” a controlled substance. He further contends that, for the same reasons, the Texas offense does not qualify as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Because Torres-Hernandez failed to object to the enhancement in the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Chavez-Hemandez, 671 F.3d 494, 497 (5th Cir. 2012).

In United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d 453, 460-62 (5th Cir. 2014), we rejected the identical argument raised by Torres-Hernandez and stated that “conviction under the administer prong is not a realistic probability because no previous Texas case has involved a conviction under this prong.” Id. at 461. We determined that the Texas offense of possession with the intent to deliver cocaine was a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2 and an aggravated felony under § 1326(b)(2). Id. at 461-62 & n. 5.

Torres-Hernandez fails to show that the district court plainly erred. See Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d at 461-62 & n. 5. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.