Elmer Banegas-Arias appeals the 36-month below-guidelines sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He challenges the 16-level enhancement imposed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for having been deported after being convicted of a drug trafficking offense. Banegas-Arias argues that his Texas conviction for delivery of a controlled substance did not qualify as a drug trafficking offense because Texas’s definition of delivery is broader than the definition of a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. He asserts that the Texas offense of delivery may be committed by “administering” a controlled substance. He further contends that, for similar reasons, the Texas offense does not qualify as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Because Banegas-Arias failed to object to the enhancement in the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Chavez-Hernandez, 671 F.3d 494, 497 (5th Cir. 2012).

Our recent decision in United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d 453, 460-62 (5th Cir. 2014), is dispositive here. As we explained in Teran-Salas, “conviction under the administer prong is not a realistic probability because no previous Texas case *313 has involved a conviction under this prong.” Id. at 461. The Texas offense of possession with the intent to deliver cocaine is a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2 and an aggravated felony. Id. at 461-62 & n. 5.

Banegas-Arias fails to show that the district court plainly erred. See id. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.