Darren L. Reagan, federal prisoner # 37109-177, appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33; he also appeals the denials of related motions to expedite proceedings, for appointment of a special prosecutor, for appointment of counsel, to recuse the trial judge, and for discovery. This court reviews the district court’s denial of Reagan’s motion for a new trial for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Piazza, 647 F.3d 559, 564 (5th Cir. 2011). “Generally, motions for new trial are disfavored and must be reviewed with great caution.” Id. at 565. Reagan has not shown that the evidence he relies upon is noncumulative, material, or would likely result in his acquittal if introduced at a new trial. See id. Consequently, he fails to show that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 33 motion. Id. at 564. As all of Reagan’s remaining motions are contingent upon his litigating his motion for a new trial, the district court likewise did not err by denying them.

AFFIRMED.