The attorney appointed to represent Noe Pacheco-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pacheco-Garcia has not *805 filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, in light of the nonreversible error in categorizing Pacheco-Garcia’s Texas sexual assault conviction as an aggravated felony, the judgment of the district court is REFORMED to show that Pacheco-Garcia was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 367-69 (5th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.