Case: 14-30208 Document: 00513000787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED April 10, 2015 No. 14-30208 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk AKER KVAERNER/IHI, formerly known as Aker Xvaerner, Incorporated, formerly known as IHI, Incorporated,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA; ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES, LIMITED; ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY; COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY; ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; NAVIGATORS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED; MCLARENS YOUNG INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON; MILLENIUM SYNDICATE AT LLOYDS 1221; LIBERTY SYNDICATE AT LLOYDS 4472,

Defendants - Appellees

************************************************************************

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA; ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES, LIMITED; ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY; COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY; NAVIGATORS MANAGEMENT COMPANY INCORPORATED; ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs - Appellees

v. Case: 14-30208 Document: 00513000787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2015

No. 14-30208

AKER KVAERNER IHI, a General Partnership,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 2:10-CV-278 & 2:10-CV-1041

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Having considered the parties’ briefs and the supplemental letter briefs filed pursuant to our directive, we DISMISS this case because the order compelling arbitration is an interlocutory order over which we lack appellate jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201–08, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16. See Sw. Elec. Power Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London,

(5th Cir. 2014). The motion to amend appellate caption is DENIED as moot. APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED (to district court); MOTION DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2