The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Gaona-Gaona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 *211 (5th Cir. 2011). Gaona-Gaona has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gaona-Gaona’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Gaona-Gaona’s motion for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED.