Sotero Ramirez-Ballejo appeals the 42-month prison term imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. For the first time on appeal, he contends *269 that the district court committed reversible plain error by imposing the 16-level enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i), based on his prior Tex-as conviction for possessing methamphetamine with intent to deliver, when the Texas statute of conviction could encompass administering a controlled substance and giving away a controlled substance for no remuneration.

These arguments are foreclosed by our recent holdings in United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), and United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d 453, 458-62 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 1892, — L.Ed.2d - (2015). Accordingly, Ramirez-Ballejo has shown no clear or obvious error with regard to his sentence. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009).

AFFIRMED.