Rolando Bernardez-Avila challenges the district court’s reimposing a $100 special assessment, following revocation of his supervised release. Revocation sentences are reviewed under a plainly unreasonable standard. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(4); e.g., United States v. Miller, 684 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). The transcript from the revocation hearing reveals the reimposition of the special assessment is contrary to the oral pronouncement and the evidence presented at the hearing. Therefore, as the Government concedes, a conflict exists between the oral and written judgments. In such a case, the oral pronouncement controls. E.g., United States v. Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001).

VACATED IN PART and this matter is REMANDED for amendment of the written judgment by deleting the reimposition of the $100 special assessment.