Juan Manuel Torres-Rodriguez appeals the 46-month sentence of imprisonment imposed following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. He contends the district court erred by applying a 12-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 based on his prior conviction of knowing or intentional delivery of marijuana. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.120(b)(3).

According to Torres-Rodriguez, the § 2L1.2 enhancement is inapplicable to his prior conviction because the Texas statute could be violated by the administration of marijuana, an act outside of the generic definition of a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. We review de novo this preserved objection. United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d 453, 457 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1892, - L.Ed.2d - (2015). However, Torres-Rodriguez cites no Texas cases, nor any facts in his own situation, showing that Texas courts have applied § 481.120 to administering. Under Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d at 460, such a showing of a theoretical possibility, as opposed to a realistic probability, is insufficient to show error.

Torres-Rodriguez additionally contends that the § 2L1.2 enhancement is inapplicable because the Texas statute may encompass giving away a controlled substance for no remuneration, also conduct outside of the genéric definition of a drug trafficking offense. This court recently rejected the argument that an offense must require remuneration to qualify as a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 201-05 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, Torres-Rodriguez’s argument is foreclosed.

AFFIRMED.