The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Quesada-Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. *247 Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Counsel also has implicitly moved to supplement the record with copies of adjudicative documents regarding Quesada-Rios’s prior state conviction. Quesada-Rios has filed a response and has moved for the appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Quesada-Rios’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Therefore, counsel’s implied motion for leave to supplement the record and motion for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Quesada-Rios’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.