U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Ernest McCarty

United States v. Ernest McCarty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 17, 2015

United States v. Ernest McCarty

Opinion

Case: 13-51040 Document: 00513120055 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 13-51040 Fifth Circuit FILED c/w No. 13-51136 July 17, 2015 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ERNEST LEE MCCARTY, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:13-CR-50-6 USDC No. 7:13-CR-148-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ernest Lee McCarty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

McCarty has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as McCarty’s response.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-51040 Document: 00513120055 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2015

No. 13-51040 c/w No. 13-51136 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.