Victor Manuel Mendoza-Toledo (Mendoza) appeals his 30-month sentence for illegal reentry on the ground that the district court erred by imposing an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). As Mendoza objected in the district court on this basis, we review the imposition of the enhancement de novo. See United States v. Morales-Martinez, 496 F.3d 356, 357 (5th Cir. 2007). We have rejected Mendoza’s reading of Moncrieffe v. Holder, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1678, 185 L.Ed.2d 727 (2013), and his argument that a state drug conviction need involve financial remuneration to constitute a drug trafficking offense for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). See United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 201-05 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.