Manuel Uresti-Garza appealed the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States after previous deportation. For the first time on appeal, he contends that the district court plainly erred in imposing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) based on his 2011 Nebraska conviction for distribution of a controlled substance because the statute of conviction, Nebraska Revised Statute § 28 — 416(1)(a) (2010), does not require proof of commercial activity.

This argument is foreclosed by our recent holdings in United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 205) (No. 14-10355), and United States v. Rodriguez-Bernal, 783 F.3d 1002, 1003, 1008 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, Uresti-Garza has shown no clear or - obvious error with regard to his sentence. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009).

AFFIRMED.