U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Anastacio Soto

United States v. Anastacio Soto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2015

United States v. Anastacio Soto

Opinion

Case: 13-20456 Document: 00513157932 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20456 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANASTACIO ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-153-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Anastacio Aranda Soto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aranda Soto has not filed a response, has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-20456 Document: 00513157932 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015

No. 13-20456 States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that Aranda Soto’s appeal of his conviction presents no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.