Appealing the .judgment in a criminal case, Raymond Easias Fisk raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145-46 (5th Cir. 2013). In Alcantar, we rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2566, 183 L.Ed.2d 450 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting chal *418 lenges to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 146. The Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternate motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.