Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mauricio Alejandro Vazquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n. 28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which this court held that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the age of consent be below 17 years old and does not include an age differential requirement, and United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 782 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1011, 190 L.Ed.2d 881 (2015), in which this court held that indecency with a child by contact under Texas Penal Code § 21.11 satisfied the generic definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.