The attorney appointed to represent Joaquin Gavilan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gavilan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gavilan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the' appeal presents ho nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Gavilan’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR, R. 42.2.