Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Angel Rafael Hernandez-Amaya raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n. 28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require a four-year age-differential between the victim and the perpetrator. He also raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 756 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1011, 190 L.Ed.2d 881 (2015), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.