Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oscar Fernando Villarreal-Espinoza raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. denied, — U.S. —, — s.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d -, 2015 WL 3867557 (Nov. 30, 2015) (No. 14-10355). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior offense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity.

Villarreal-Espinoza also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in § 2L1.2'(b)(l)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug trafficking offense.

The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.