U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Oneida Saylor

United States v. Oneida Saylor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 15, 2015

United States v. Oneida Saylor

Opinion

Case: 15-10205 Document: 00513307310 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10205 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ONEIDA DENISE SAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-219-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oneida Denise Saylor raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Tuma, 738 F.3d 681, 693 (5th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2875 (2014). In Tuma, we held that Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013) applies “only to facts that increase a statutory mandatory minimum sentence” and rejected the argument that Alleyne requires that any fact that increases a defendant’s minimum

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-10205 Document: 00513307310 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015

No. 15-10205 sentence, including facts that raise the guidelines range, be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Tuma, 738 F.3d at 693. The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative request for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.