U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Jorge Rodriguez-Penaloza

United States v. Jorge Rodriguez-Penaloza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 16, 2015

United States v. Jorge Rodriguez-Penaloza

Opinion

Case: 15-40251 Document: 00513308873 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40251 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE RODRIGUEZ-PENALOZA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-268-3

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Rodriguez-Penaloza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Penaloza has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez-Penaloza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-40251 Document: 00513308873 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015

No. 15-40251 the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.