USA v. Cesar Hernandez
USA v. Cesar Hernandez
Opinion
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Orduno Favela Hernandez (Favela) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Favela has filed a response. The' record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Favela’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United *377 States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).
We have reviewed -counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Favela’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.